Lasar Letter on the Federal Communications Commission    
 


Sun, May 11, 5:03pm



Navigation


benton news


Ars Technica


freepress news


progress and freedom foundation news


 

New obesity study says little about TV junk food advertising

by Matthew Lasar  Aug 30 2007 - 11:13am     

Maybe the authors didn't think it was important. Or maybe they forgot, but for whatever reason, F as in Fat: How Obesity Policies Are Failing in America doesn't have much to say about junk food ads on TV.

The study, just released by the Trust for America's Health, is all over the news with its mediagenic ranking of states with the highest obesity levels (Mississippi wins the Plumpness Prize; 30.6 percent of its residents qualify as obese).

The 120 page survey faults the United States for lacking a national plan to combat the epidemic of overweightness and obesity that has swept the country over the past two decades.

"Individuals are often told to take personal responsibility and lose weight . . . " F as in Fat observes. "More than $35 billion is spent annually on weight loss-related products and services. Clearly, the strategy of focusing on personal responsibility alone is failing."

But the report fails to acknowledge an obvious point: every day television, newspaper and Internet advertising urges millions of Americans to gain weight, to consume cheeseburgers, candy, potato chips, fatty cereals, and megasodas like the McDonalds Hugo—a 42 oz, 410 calorie cannister of sugar, water, and food coloring the size of a small fire extinguisher.

It's not that F as in Fat doesn't know that this is a problem. One of its five recommendations for government action is for the Federal government to "develop guidelines regarding the advertising and marketing to children and youth by convening a national conference."

The survey mentions that the Federal Trade Commission held a big meeting in July to work with industry on the issue, and that some companies have developed voluntary policies. But the "federal government is not providing direct leadership over the effort and does not have a plan for evaluating the content of the ads or holding industry accountable," it concludes.

True that, but F as in Fat makes little effort to explore why this might be.

Surprisingly, the study does not mention once the efforts of the Federal Communications Commission to address the obesity crisis. Even the more conservative members of the FCC acknowledge the relationship between TV advertising and child obesity. At a Children Now conference in November of 2006, FCC Commissioner Deborah Taylor Tate pointed out that toddlers don't understand until they are seven or eight that the claims of food advertisers are not facts, but efforts to get them to want products.

". . . this cognitive ability combined with the prevalence of unhealthy foods and a more sedentary lifestyle have created a perfect storm that has made childhood obesity a nationwide problem," Tate continued.

But when the FCC issued an Order in 2004 creating some solid rules that limit junk food advertising on digital television, industry fought back, some threatening lawsuits, and some actually suing the FCC.

Finally the Commission's Gloria Tristani got some key players together, from the American Academy of Pediatrics to Disney, and they worked out a set of consensus guidelines on product placement, host selling, and links to Web sites on children's digital TV.

It took years to get the agreement in place. The rules are better than nothing, of course, but they're obviously weaker than what the FCC intended in its 2004 Order.

And, in case you haven't noticed, they aren't stemming the epidemic of childhood obesity.

Since then the Commission has limited itself to participation in a Task Force on Media and Childhood Obesity, and to occasionally going apoplectic over some company's announcement that they're going to voluntarily mend their advertising ways.

And so if the F as in Fat crowd thinks that setting up another conference is going to lead to anything substantial, it's because they haven't paid attention to the experience of the FCC over the last three years.

Tell you what we'd recommend over here at LLFCC, boy howdy. We'd get members of Congress talking about bringing back the Fairness Doctrine for junk food ads, just like the FCC briefly did for cigarette advertising in the 1960s. Every Hugo spot broadcast on TV would permit a public interest group to air a counter ad, warning about the links between obesity and megasodas.

And if the industry can't handle that, then just ban junk food advertising on TV, we say, the way Congress banned cigarette spots in the early 1970s.

Those proposals ought to get the corporate suits jumping—good exercise, actually; might trim more than a few waistlines.


delicious  digg  reddit  magnoliacom  newsvine  furl      technorati  icerocket
Obesity Causes
AndyT  Sep 12 2007 - 3:41am   

It is imperative that they realize the importance of child psychology and that how they are influenced by such advertising. Obesity in children is on rise and while everyone is trying to fight this problem, restricting television would play a major role.


TV Junk FoodThe article
sherry gendelman  Sep 11 2007 - 5:51am   

Your article was so compelling I had to get up to snack three times. Thanks for the insight with humor.....sherry g


Obesity and TV advertising
John Whiting  Sep 2 2007 - 9:43pm   

Matthew - You've hit the nail squarely on the cuticle. In Britain the junk food pushers are sponsoring school athletics and telling kids to exercise more, as if what's going into their mouths had nothing to do with it. Just keep selling the poison but give away a few antidotes. I'll pass this on to Andy Smith, who's about to give a paper at the Oxford Food Symposium on "Marketing Junk Food to Children".

John Whiting

www.whitings-writings.com


The same with cigarette
mginsberg  Feb 26 2008 - 10:51am   

The same with cigarette companies who promote quiting smoking with ads on TV they only do this because the government is slightly making them, the cost? Hardly what they profit from their products and they know people will continue buying them. Just like fast food, they can pretend to make things healthier offer salads but people are still going to get their quarter pounder super sized with cheese and bacon because they know it taste great. Eating disorder treatments have become along the lines of any other addiction treatment.


 
Recent Posts


User login


Recent comments


Recent blog posts


Syndicate


Techdirt


Blogroll