![]() |
Home About Blog on this site! Contact LLFCC Join the LLFCC listserv Login/Register Search |
Sun, Jun 22, 2:55pm
|
Ask Dr. FCC's blog
by Ask Dr. FCC Aug 11 2007 - 1:38pm DTV transition
Dear Dr. FCC: I am hearing alarming reports that at some point in the next 500 days or so a whole bunch of TV sets are going to go dark because of the "DTV transition." I love my TV set so much. Why would anyone want to do this to us? Clarence Dear Clarence: Please don't worry. No one wants to take your television set away from you, least of all the Bush administration. Here are the facts.
Update: FCC Consumer Advisory Committee tackles DTV transition.
DTV transition Web sites: The FCC's DTV facts site The National Association of Broadcasters' DTV Answers site The NTIA's converter coupon program DTV Facts, an unofficial site The United States government has set February 17th, 2009 as the last day that television stations may broadcast their signal using the analog method. Analog systems use radio frequencies to transmit sound and pictures. Digital systems transmit TV signals, well, via digits, complex packets of zeros and ones that get reassembled into video and audio when they reach your television set. Everybody gets something from digital or "DTV" broadcasting. You'll get better images and sound, with much less interference. Plus DTV transmission will allow TV license holders to broadcast several streams from one signal, a technique called "multicasting." This means that you will have even more channels to choose from, depending on the extent to which cable and satellite companies pick them all up, still a matter of dispute.
read more login or register to post comments
by Ask Dr. FCC Jul 18 2007 - 4:57pm
Alphonse asks: Dear Dr. FCC: The other day I was giving a report in my high school class trying to explain why net neutrality is so important, and, like, somebody asked me for a definition of net neutrality, and, like, I couldn't explain it, but I said I'd ask you. So, like, what is net neutrality anyway? Dear Alphonse: The hell if I know, kid. Let's, like, ask the experts. From About.com: "Net neutrality refers to the way information is transmitted on the internet. With a neutral internet set up, internet service providers and search engines merely send you the information or the website for which are looking. ISPs are hoping to replace this neutral system with a fee based system in which websites would be pay a fee to the ISP for the service, and the sites that pay the highest fees would be prioritized . . . " From Common Cause: "Network neutrality is the principle that Internet users should be able to access any web content they choose and use any applications they choose, without restrictions or limitations imposed by their Internet service provider."
read more login or register to post comments
by Ask Dr. FCC Apr 21 2007 - 8:36am
Julie writes: Dear Dr. FCC: The problem is that I went to the FCC's Web site and it's totally confusing. Why do they make it so confusing? Can you help? Julie
The FCC's Comment form
Popular proceedings and docket numbers (just plug in the right docket number [below] for text box #1 on the form):
by Ask Dr. FCC Apr 6 2007 - 4:35pm
Dear Dr. FCC: At our Pacifica listener-supported radio station, KPFA in Berkeley, some of my friends are calling the station's Interim Program Director a Stalinist, Zionist, corporate COINTELPRO agent and Hillary Obama wannabe because she circulated a memo reminding on-air programmers not to urge listeners to go to demonstrations and events. Doesn't this go against KPFA founder Lewis Hill's mission of advocacy journalism? People keep telling me that the FCC has some rule about this? Is that true? Dazed and Confused Dear Dazed: This is not a Federal Communications Commission matter. The FCC has no rules barring programmers at non-commercial stations from urging people to go somewhere and do something, as long as it does not involve voting for a specific candidate or buying a station underwriters' product. But the rule you cite properly addresses liability issues and KPFA's true historic mission as it was expressed and practiced by the station's founder, Lewis Hill. First, let's go to the immediate record.
by Ask Dr. FCC Mar 25 2007 - 3:12pm
Alphonse writes: "Dear Dr. FCC: We have a listener supported non-profit FM station in our small city, but we're having a hard time getting subscribers. Some of our board members think we should start running advertisements. Is that ok? —”Alphonse" Dear Alphonse: Sorry, but your listener supported, non-profit station can't run "commercials" or "advertisements." But I put those words in quotes because, as you'll soon see, you can run on-air spots that pretty much look, walk, and quack like ads, they just have to stay within certain bounds Section 399B(b)(2) of the Communications Act makes the policy clear: "No public broadcast station may make its facilities available to any person for the broadcasting of any advertisement." The statute defines "advertisement" as a message or program that is broadcast in exchange for remuneration and that promotes
The FCC enforces these rules, sometimes. Here are two recent cases: In 2004 the hammer came down on Christian non-commercial station WCVZ(FM) in South Zanesville, Ohio. A year earlier the station received remuneration to run announcements on behalf of a station underwriter. The underwriter, Barnes Advertising, promoted the station on local billboards in exchange for the on-air notices. |
|
LLFCC (Lasar's Letter on the FCC); copyright 2005, 2006, 2007.
Please feel free to post these articles on your site or whatever because you'll do it anyway. Don't forget to credit the author and link to the site. Ideally you will post part of the article and add a link to the rest. |