![]() |
Home About Blog on this site! Contact LLFCC History 10B History 110F Join the LLFCC listserv Login/Register Search |
Fri, May 16, 3:58am
|
FCC opens comment cycle yet again on bird tower collisions
by Matthew Lasar Nov 5 2006 - 1:04pm Environment
The Federal Communications Commission has opened a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on "whether the FCC should take measures to reduce the number of migratory bird collisions with communications towers." This is the second comment cycle the agency has launched on the matter over the past three years—the first a Notice of Inquiry that the Commission authorized in 2003. Meanwhile as many as 15 million migrating birds may have perished in collisions with U.S. wireless towers during this period. U.S. Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service documents cite statistics estimating that communications towers kill between four and five million birds a year, and that the number and size of these towers are growing at an "exponential" rate. The FCC's new Notice asks the public to comment on:
The Commission launched the notice at its Friday November 3rd Open Meeting. FCC Commissioner Robert M. McDowell urged the agency to tackle the issue "while not unduly hampering the ability of industry to deliver new, advanced services to American consumers as quickly and economically as possible." Commissioner Michael Copps chided the FCC for its delay in acting on the dilemma. "Put bluntly, for too many years this agency treated a widely-recognized problem with not-so-benign neglect," Copps stated. "Now we have learned, I hope, that this is not a problem that will just go away if we ignore it." The FCC first invited public comment on this issue in response to a petition brought before the agency by the Forest Preservation Council, the American Bird Conservancy, and the Friends of the Earth in 2002. The three groups asked for a moratorium on new transmitter tower construction until the completion of an environmental review. In response the agency issued a Notice of Inquiry on the matter, which the petitioners described as inadequate to what they called an emergency situation. "There are no time limits for the completion of the NOI and no proposed actions to benefit birds and prevent the annual killing of millions of birds," their response to the NOI, filed in November of 2003, charged. "The NOI could proceed indefinitely, thus providing another convenient excuse to continue the FCC's years of delays in addressing the killing of millions of migratory birds at towers." More stories:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
add new comment printer friendly version
Fish and Wildlife Service Memorandum of 9/14/2000
Bob Mason (not verified) Nov 12 2006 - 9:10pm
The memorandum referenced in your article of 10/28/2006 proposes "Service Interim Guidelines for Recommendations" on tower construction, etc. It also states that a working group has been formed to do a study to determine the best ways to prevent bird strikes. Do you know if this study was ever done, ever completed, and whether final as opposed to interim guidelines were ever promulgated by Fish and Wildlife or the dept of the interior?
reply
|
|
LLFCC (Lasar's Letter on the FCC); copyright 2005, 2006, 2007.
Please feel free to post these articles on your site or whatever because you'll do it anyway. Don't forget to credit the author and link to the site. Ideally you will post part of the article and add a link to the rest. |