Risk analyst accuses state and local governments of ducking responsibilities for emergency communications support

In a C-Net op-ed piece, Lee M. Zeichner suggested that, in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, state regulators were "heading for cover" rather than address emergency communications issues. "The new mantra is that consumers must fend for themselves in the first 72 hours—which shrewdly shifts responsibility away from state and local support."

Two key media groups—The Consumer''s Union (CU) and Parent's Television Council (PTC)—have issued statements supporting FCC Chair Kevin Martin's "a la carte" proposal for cable television.

Martin called for the unbundling of cable packages at yesterday's forum on decency held by the Senate Commerce Committee. He urged broadcasters to "allow consumers to choose a specific number of channels from a menu of available programming for a fixed price — e.g., 10 channels for $20, 20 channels for $30 etc. Parents then would be able to receive — and pay for — only that programming that they are comfortable bringing into their homes."

The Consumer''s Union praised Martin's suggestion on their Web site. "Cable companies and broadcasters have fought a la carte pricing for years, hiding behind the fallacious argument that popular and unpopular programming had to be bundled together to keep all programming afloat ... " declared the group''s spokesperson Gene Kimmelman. "Today, Chairman Martin has blown a huge hole through this fortress of deceit."

A consortium of civil liberties groups, corporations, libraries, and universities will challenge a Federal Communications Commission ruling that they must make their Internet infrastructures easier to penetrate by the police.', 'Sun Microsystems, the American Library Association, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, among others, will take the FCC decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. They argue that the FCC is wrongly applying the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) to the Internet.

"CALEA was drafted specifically to regulate phone networks, which are designed to be closed systems . . . " the Electronic Frontier Foundation''s briefing argues. "If CALEA is misapplied to the Internet, the results will be disastrous. The privacy of innocent people is likely to be violated, innovation will certainly be stifled, and the current and future functionality of the Internet will be crippled."